Misplaced Pages

User talk:Denisarona

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Deepfriedokra (talk | contribs) at 03:31, 14 February 2020 (Removal of rollback: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:31, 14 February 2020 by Deepfriedokra (talk | contribs) (Removal of rollback: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archiving icon
Archives (index)

Index 1, 2, 3



This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 1 section is present.

Welcome!

Hello, Denisarona, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Misplaced Pages:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?


Happy New Year Denisarona!

Happy New Year! Hello Denisarona:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Misplaced Pages's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 05:27, 28 December 2019 (UTC)



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Éire

Hello Denisarona, Many thanks for your interest in my edits on the Éire page. could you please explain why you don't like my edit. I thought adding more hyperlinks would enrich the page. Have I made a mistake? Also sorry if I'm writing this talk in the wrong place. I'm a bit rusty on the correct protocols. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eimhin de Róiste (talkcontribs) 16:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

No problem - I've replied on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread can be found at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Denisarona's repeated rollback misuse and failure to communicate. Your participation is highly encouraged. Iaritmioawp (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Removal of rollback

There has been a discussion of your misuse of rollback and a lack of the requisite communication. One must be careful to use rollback correctly. Misusing it can be more disruptive and more damaging than the edits for which it is used correctly. Communication about the use of rollback is crucial. Yes, I know recipients of legitimate rollback are often angry and abusive. The same can be said of those whose edits were rolled back in error. In either situation, it is important to be able to respond calmly and civilly in explaining one's use of rollback. If rollback has been used in error, then one must quickly and civilly respond to concerns about one's errors. One really needs to apologize for such mistakes. For this reason, I am removing your rollback. You may reapply for rollback once you have adequately dealt with concerns about misuse and insufficient communication when concerns are expressed about its use.-- Deepfriedokra 03:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)