This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Larry laptop (talk | contribs) at 10:51, 16 December 2006 (→Left Misplaced Pages?: of course it's a lie, your user contributions shows that it is a lie.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:51, 16 December 2006 by Larry laptop (talk | contribs) (→Left Misplaced Pages?: of course it's a lie, your user contributions shows that it is a lie.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This user has departed Misplaced Pages. Talk page messages may remain unanswered for some time
General Rules
- Questions asked of me will be responded to on THIS Talk page. I will not be posting a duplicate reply on the Talk page of the User who asked the question.
- Unsigned questions or questions from anon users will generally be deleted unanswered. Some special cases may apply.
- Obscene and personal attack messages will be deleted and reported as vandalism.
- Please use the "== XX ==" format when posting messages and sign all messages.
Archives
- User talk:Husnock/Archive 1 (April 2004 - April 2005)
- User talk:Husnock/Archive 2 (April 2005 - June 2005)
- User talk:Husnock/Archive 3 (June 2005 - September 2005)
- User talk:Husnock/Archive 4 (September 2005 - January 2006)
- User talk:Husnock/Archive 5 (January 2006 - June 2006)
- User talk:Husnock/Archive 6 (June 2006 - December 2006)
Current Posts
Farewell
I'm glad you came back to vote keep. I assume you saw my comment on the AfD. --Elaragirl 18:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I had to come out of retirement for that one, but will still be very uninvolved with this site. The whole death threat accusation really upset me and shames the name of Misplaced Pages and what we stand for here. Thank you, though, for your kind words! -Husnock 04:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: Tone
I'm sorry you thought I was being harsh. My post was intended to express the confusion I honestly feel on this topic. I am trying to understand the basis for that article and how it fit into Misplaced Pages, but am genuinely struggling. Thank you for explaining script error. Perhaps I was too blunt- I certainly meant no personal criticism beyond the fact that I worry those editing this article have become rather presonally involved with it and understandably defensive as a result. - WJBscribe 04:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- I am very touchy about these things as I was recently accused of making a death threat which has caused me to pretty much stop editing on this site. Thank you for your kind reply. -Husnock 04:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- In reply to your further comment. To clarify "you put your own views above the whole basis for these articles" was meant to suggest a general preference by all editors of the article for fan based commentaries on Star Trek over the show itself. It was not meant as an insult, or a personal reference to you. I apologise if you took it that way. - WJBscribe 04:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC) I have striked (struck?) through the offending words and replaced them with something more neutral that better reflects my point anyway. The edit summary includes an apology. For the record, I will not edit the article as I feel it outside my competence- I am familiar only with the show and not its surrounding works. I merely raise points on the talk page that are of concern to me. - WJBscribe 04:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Left Misplaced Pages?
How is that you've left Misplaced Pages but manage to edit every day? Isn't that message just a flat out lie? --Charlesknight 10:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think I reverted some vandalism and participated in an AfD vote after invited to do so by some respected editors. Other than that, I have ceased all editing on this site. So, no, its not a "flat out lie". -Husnock 10:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
It is a lie - you are currently actively editing articles. If you don't like me calling it a lie - take it to an admin. You claim you have departed, you are still editing - therefore the statement is untrue - it's a lie. --Charlesknight 10:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)