This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shams2006 (talk | contribs) at 23:44, 18 December 2006 (→Proposed tasks: this 'proposed task' is implying that negative POV is needed in Muhammad article?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:44, 18 December 2006 by Shams2006 (talk | contribs) (→Proposed tasks: this 'proposed task' is implying that negative POV is needed in Muhammad article?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Misplaced Pages's deletion policy.
Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for Deletion page.
You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move this page (without knowing exactly what you are doing), or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, read the Guide to Deletion.
To list a Misplaced Pages namespace page for deletion after adding {{subst:md1}} at the top, you have to do the following:
| I. | Create its MfD subpage.
Add this text: {{subst:md2|pg=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Islam/Islam and Controversy task force|text=Reason}} ~~~~ |
| II. | Add a line to today's MfD.
Add this text: {{subst:md3|pg=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Islam/Islam and Controversy task force}}. Include "Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Islam/Islam and Controversy task force" in the edit summary. |
- This is a task force of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Islam.
Mission objectives
Shortcut- ]
This is a project aimed at increasing the quality of the articles related to Criticism of Islam and its related articles, elevating the articles to "Good article" standard, and then all the way to "Featured article" standard.
We do this by:
- Making sure all statments are sourced using the "<ref>source</ref>" model
- Making sure the articles follow the given standards.
As of , we have X (number) of articles at the "Good article" standard and Y (number) at the "Featured article" standard.
{{WikiProject Criticism of Islam}} is added to the top of the talk pages of any articles relevant to this project. This will make them appear on the Category:WikiProject Criticism of Islam.
Sub-sections
- The article standardization section
- The article assessment section, the assessment department of this project.
- The collaboration section, the collaboration department of this project.
- The peer review section, the peer review department of this project.
Proposals for new articles
Does anyone have any thoughts on this? We have Category:Critics of Islam. A list should also exist which classifies these people meaningfully. --Matt57 04:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- This list was redirected to Criticism of Islam by user Beland. I might look into it later if we can build a good separate list on its own. --Matt57 15:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
New articles
Proposed tasks
- Try to make the Non-Islamic views of Muhammad article feature both supporters and critics of Muhammad.
See also
External links
- (add here
websitesbooks fulfilling WP:RS standard and critical of Islam)
Members
- --Matt57 00:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- --Arrow740 00:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- --Merzbow 01:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- --Sefringle 03:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- --Striver 22:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC) (with reservations, only as an observer - ill leave if it develops in a non-neutral maner)
- --Strothra 19:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- --User:Boris Johnson VC 16:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- -- ALM 18:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC) No WP:OR by using Quranic Ayats without secondary sources, no POV, no faith-free.. and family websites (alles nur WP:RS).
- --ITAQALLAH 21:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- -- Shams2006 23:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC) As long as this stupid group exists, I'd might as well keep an eye on what it does.