Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GRuban (talk | contribs) at 18:57, 7 December 2020 (→Greta Thunberg: Thanks - like heading removal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• WT:GGTF

• Welcome to the GGTF: the gender gap task force. Please sign up if you'd like to help.
• The talk page is for friendly discussion about anything related to closing Misplaced Pages's gender gap, including asking for help with articles, AfDs, and so on.
• Add new posts to the end or click here to start a new topic.
• Sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13

​By topic Categories and gender Gender-related arbitration cases

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Proposed mass deletion of top-division footballer / soccer player articles

An editor is nominating numerous articles about women footballers / soccer players who have played in top leagues in France and Sweden. The leagues most likely were included on WP:NFOOTY unbalanced list of notable leagues at the time of creation - and have since been removed but that's probably irrelevant here. Basically, many of the articles need improved referencing to meet WP:GNG.

If any editors have time to review and search for references that support WP:GNG and participate in deletion discussion if there is one, it is most appreciated. Here's the list:

Articles for deletion

• 06 Jan 2025 – Arsenal Women 2–3 Wolfsburg Women (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Kingsif (t · c) was closed as delete by Liz (t · c) on 13 Jan 2025; see discussion (12 participants)
• 26 Dec 2024 – Sydney Pulver (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by JTtheOG (t · c) was closed as redirect by Liz (t · c) on 16 Jan 2025; see discussion (8 participants; relisted)

Featured list candidates

• 02 Jan 2025 – List of National Women's Soccer League seasons (talk · edit · hist) was FL nominated by SounderBruce (t · c); see discussion

Good article nominees

• 03 Nov 2024 – Beth Mead (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Spiderone (t · c); see discussion

Requested moves

• 12 Jan 2025 – 2024 Women's Olympic Football Tournament – Oceania Qualifier (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Football at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's qualification (OFC) by Footballnerd2007 (t · c); see discussion
• 06 Jan 2025 – Turkish Women's Football Super League (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Women's Süper Lig by Beshogur (t · c); see discussion
• 31 Dec 2024 – Serie A (women's football) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Serie A Femminile by S.A. Julio (t · c); see discussion

Articles to be merged

• 16 Jan 2025 – Kathrin Lehmann (footballer) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Kathrin Lehmann by Dwanyewest (t · c); see discussion

Articles for creation

• 16 Jan 2025 – Draft:Signe Holt Andersen (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Dwanyewest (t · c)

Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 19:49, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for posting here about it. SarahSV 19:51, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Centralized discussion here: Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women in Red#Proposed deletion of women's footballer / soccer player articles. Hmlarson (talk) 23:10, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Discussion of draft Wikimedia Universal Code of Conduct closing in nine days

A Wikimedia committee has posted a draft version of a Universal Code of Conduct at meta which, while it contains language about respecting the diversity of community members and condemning hate speech that appears in vandalism, does not appear to prohibit or otherwise mention racism, sexism, homophobia, or other forms of prejudice outside of vandalism and direct insults (in the English version, at least.) It does concern itself with, for example, defining repeated sarcasm as a form of harassment. In the page containing summaries of committee meetings the words "racism", "sexism", and "homophobia" also do not appear. (In the English version.)

Perhaps there is a good or practical reason for this; I'm not personally familiar with the high-level Wikimedia policy development process. But the discussion of the UCoC draft closes on October 7, after which the drafting committee will submit its recommendation to the Wikimedia Board of Trustees, so I am placing this message in this talk page in the hopes of ensuring that editors who can comment constructively on the absence of language providing guidance on non-insult, non-vandalism expressions of prejudice get a chance to comment. --▸₷truthious Ⓑandersnatch◂ 19:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The draft code doesn't mention sexism, racism, or homophobia directly but these are covered in the wording as I understand it:

Insults: This includes name calling, using slurs or stereotypes, and any attacks based on personal characteristics. Insults may refer to perceived characteristics like intelligence, appearance, ethnicity, race, religion, culture, caste, sexual orientation, gender, disability, age, nationality, political affiliation, or other characteristics. In some cases, repeated mockery, sarcasm, or aggression may qualify as insults collectively, even if individual statements would not.

JezGrove (talk) 20:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Age visibility for articles about women

Hi everyone I wondered if the insertion of DOB for women may present a form of gender imbalance in that women are more likely than men to be the victims of ageism and accompanying discrimination, and may prefer not to have their ages registered on wikipedia? Is there any option for the subjects of articles to request that their age is occluded, for this reason? My apologies if this has already been debated. Many thanks and cheers, Miles Quest (talk) 19:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

@Miles Quest: WP:BLPDOB has some info on standard practice for when BLP subjects request their DOB be omitted from their article. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks for your reply GorillaWarfare - will take a look - cheers Miles Quest (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Greta Thunberg

Greta Thunberg's article starts with the Mental Health section. There is a discussion about whether it is appropriate, as the typical WP pattern for health disclosure is at the end of the article under the Health Section. Many prominent male figures had mental conditions that began to appear in childhood, but their articles do not start with the section titled Mental Health. I am yet to see another article on a well-known person (not a mental health advocate) that begins with the section titled Mental Health. However, if it exists, it doesn't appear objective. Please provide your inputs if you are interested to discuss this in her "talk" page. https://en.wikipedia.org/Greta_Thunberg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Partizan Kuzya (talk • contribs) 18:24, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I can see both sides here - it's an important part of her early life, which is naturally the first section of the article, and it does naturally flow into the discussion of the activism, yet, yes, it does tend to throw shade at it. I think your suggestion of removing the subsection heading is a good compromise, it's otherwise a 2 paragraph section, we can live without it. --GRuban (talk) 18:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• Women's football task force