Misplaced Pages

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article may have too many section headers. Please help consolidate the article. (June 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article contains instructions, advice, or how-to content. Please help rewrite the content so that it is more encyclopedic or move it to Wikiversity, Wikibooks, or Wikivoyage. (June 2024) This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (June 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (June 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The actio iniuriarum is an action for delict which "not only seeks to protect an individual's dignity and reputation but also his or her physical integrity."

Harm or loss

The harm or loss which gives rise to the actio iniuriarum is a violation of a personality interest, usually classified, as per the definition above, under the following three headings:

• corpus, or bodily integrity;
• dignitas, or dignity; and
• fama, or reputation.

Conduct

The delictual conduct required for a successful application of the action comes usually in the form of statements or positive conduct. Seldom is it an omission.

Causation

Causation is normally not an issue in respect of the actio iniuriarum, but it may become one in some instances, as in deprivation-of-liberty cases.

Wrongfulness

Conduct will be wrongful in terms of this action if it is objectively unreasonable and without lawful justification: "Having a valid defence means that the conduct is justified and the behaviour is not wrongful or unlawful."

Fault

There must be fault in the form of intention, although this is controversial, as some in South Africa contend that the action has developed in the last century to include some instances, such as those involving deprivation of liberty, where liability is strict, and others such as defamation involving the media, where liability is negligence-based.

See also

• Delict
• Lex Aquilia

References

• JM Burchell Principles of delict (1993).
• M Loubser (ed) The Law of Delict in South Africa (2010).

Notes

1. Burchell 212.
2. Loubser 26.
3. Loubser 26.
4. Loubser 26.
5. Loubser 26.
6. Loubser 26.

• Roman law
• Delict