| Clark v. Rameker | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided June 12, 2014 | |
| Full case name | Clark v. Rameker |
| Citations | 573 U.S. 122 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Funds held in inherited Individual Retirement Accounts are not "retirement funds" and are not exempt from the bankruptcy estate. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(c) | |
Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. 122 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that funds held in inherited Individual Retirement Accounts are not "retirement funds" within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(c) and therefore not exempt from the bankruptcy estate.
References
- Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. 122 (2014).
- "Asset protection of retirement funds after Clark". Journal of Accountancy. 2014-10-01. Retrieved 2024-11-05.
External links
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |