Misplaced Pages

Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
2024 United States Supreme Court case
Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 19, 2024
Full case nameFederal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre
Docket no.22-1178
Citations601 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
A complaint about being put on the No Fly List is not moot simply because the government later took the plaintiff off the List. To show mootness, the government must disclose the conduct that landed the plaintiff on the No Fly List and ensure that they will not be placed back on the List for engaging in the same or similar conduct in the future.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinion
MajorityGorsuch, joined by unanimous

Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, 601 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a complaint about being put on the No Fly List is not moot simply because the government later took the plaintiff off the List. To show mootness, the government must disclose the conduct that landed the plaintiff on the No Fly List and ensure that they will not be placed back on the List for engaging in the same or similar conduct in the future.

References

  1. Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, No. 22-1178, 601 U.S. ___ (2024).
  2. "Supreme Court rules No Fly List dispute can go forward". SCOTUSblog. 2024-03-19. Retrieved 2024-12-15.

External links

  • Text of Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, No. 22-1178, 601 U.S. ___ (2024) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)

Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories:
Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre Add topic