Misplaced Pages

Niemotko v. Maryland

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

1951 United States Supreme Court case
Niemotko v. Maryland
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 17, 1950
Decided January 15, 1951
Full case nameNiemotko v. Maryland
Citations340 U.S. 268 (more)71 S. Ct. 325, 95 L. Ed. 2d 267, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 2247
Case history
Prior194 Md. 247, 71 A.2d 9 (1950); probable jurisdiction noted, 70 S. Ct. 576 (1950).
Court membership
Chief Justice
Fred M. Vinson
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas
Robert H. Jackson · Harold H. Burton
Tom C. Clark · Sherman Minton
Case opinions
MajorityVinson, joined by Reed, Douglas, Jackson, Burton, Clark, and Minton
ConcurrenceBlack (no opinion)
ConcurrenceFrankfurter

Niemotko v. Maryland, 340 U.S. 268 (1951), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the city of Havre de Grace, Maryland had violated the free exercise of Niemotko's religion by not issuing a permit for him and his religious group (the Jehovah's Witnesses) to meet in a public park when other religious and civic groups had been given permits for holding their meetings there.

References

  1. Niemotko v. Maryland, 340 U.S. 268 (1951).

External links

U.S. Supreme Court Free Exercise Clause case law
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Exclusion of religion
from public benefits
Ministerial exception
Statutory religious exemptions
RFRA
RLUIPA
Others
U.S. Supreme Court Freedom of Speech Clause case law
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Unprotected speech
Clear and
present danger

and imminent
lawless action
Defamation and
false speech
Fighting words and
the heckler's veto
True threats and
threatening the
President of the
United States
Obscenity
Speech integral
to criminal conduct
Strict scrutiny
Overbreadth and
Vagueness doctrines
Symbolic speech
versus conduct
Content-based
restrictions
Content-neutral
restrictions
In the
public forum
Designated
public forum
Nonpublic
forum
Compelled speech
Compelled subsidy
of others' speech
Government grants
and subsidies
Government speech
Loyalty oaths
School speech
Public employees
Hatch Act and
similar laws
Licensing and
restriction of speech
Commercial speech
Campaign finance and
political speech
Anonymous speech
State action
Official retaliation
Boycotts
Prisons


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: