Misplaced Pages

Presumption of validity in Canadian patent law

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Canadian patent law
Patentability
Infringement
Legal texts
Governmental organization
Categories
Patent law
Overviews
Procedural concepts
Patentability requirements and related concepts
Other legal requirements
By region / country
By specific subject matter
See also

The presumption of validity refers to the fact that, once a patent has been issued, the courts will presume that it is valid, unless there is evidence to the contrary.

Canada

Section 43(2) of the Patent Act creates the presumption of validity:

After the patent is issued, it shall, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, be valid and avail the patentee and the legal representatives of the patentee for the term mentioned in section 44 or 45, whichever is applicable.

In Diversified Products Corp v Tye-Sil Corp, the Federal Court of Appeal held that the presumption of validity merely gives rise to an evidential burden on a balance of probabilities.

References

  1. Canadian Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4, s 43(2).
Canadian law
Sources
Core areas
Other areas
Courts
Education
Category:
Presumption of validity in Canadian patent law Add topic