Misplaced Pages

Snokhachestvo

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Type of sexual relation in the Russian Empire

You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Russian. (February 2023) Click for important translation instructions.
  • Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Misplaced Pages.
  • Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 1,061 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization.
  • Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
  • You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Russian Misplaced Pages article at ]; see its history for attribution.
  • You may also add the template {{Translated|ru|Снохачество}} to the talk page.
  • For more guidance, see Misplaced Pages:Translation.
The Father-in-Law, a 1888 painting by Vladimir Makovsky

Traditional practice until the beginning of the XX century in the Russian Empire, snokhachestvo (Russian: снохачество) referred to sexual relations between a pater familias (bolshak) of a Russian peasant household (dvor) and his daughter-in-law (snokha) during the minority or absence of his son. Presumably this practice was originally (before Christianization) a polyandrous union in which one woman had two husbands, with one of these husbands being the son of the second. Finally as “snokhachestvo” it was formed after Christianization and as such it became especially widespread in the Russian Empire in the XVIII-XIX centuries, due to a whole set of circumstances, including the conscription of young peasants and the withdrawal, when young people went to work in the cities and left their wives at home in the village. Sexual intercourse between the head of a peasant family and his daughter-in-law was in fact a common aspect of life in a patriarchal family. “Nowhere, it seems, except in Russia,” wrote V.D. Nabokov, ”is there at least one kind of incest which has acquired the character of an almost normal domestic phenomenon. Although this form of incest was condemned by enlightened society, it was not considered a serious offense by the peasants.

The reasons for cohabitation varied from early marriages and simple sexual attraction of the father-in-law to the daughter-in-law to economic reasons (seasonal work of the married son, when the daughter-in-law was unprotected and forced to cohabit with her father-in-law). But the main sources of this phenomenon were the unrestricted power of the and the almost complete powerless position of women in the family.

With a view to attracting additional workers to the household, marriages in rural Russia were frequently contracted when the groom was six or seven years old. During her husband's minority, the bride often had to tolerate advances of her assertive father-in-law. For example, in the middle of the 19th century in Tambov Governorate, 12–13-year-old boys were often married to 16–17-year-old girls. The boys' fathers used to arrange such marriages to take advantage of their sons' lack of experience. Snokhachestvo entailed conflicts in the family and put moral pressure on the mother-in-law, who usually treated her son's wife as a rival for her own husband's affections.

Russian ethnographer and fiction writer S. V. Maksimov comes to the conclusion that “incest” (including in-laws) is common among the peasant class, but especially strong among former military villagers and Don Cossacks. Ethnographer M. N. Kharuzin wrote a large work devoted to various aspects of life of the Don Cossacks, including attention to snogachastvo: Among the Don Cossacks, marriages were often arranged at the will of the parents. According to the ethnographer, in some cases (usually when the bride was “20 years old or older” and the groom much younger), the fathers of the grooms chose a bride “of course, one that they themselves liked”, and after the wedding began to take care of her: “The attention of the master and the complete freedom given by him tickle the ego of the daughter-in-law”.

In a large peasant family, as a rule, there were several families of different generations, and the head of the family, the Bolshak, usually had great power over all the households. Many researchers consider snokhachstvo to be an ingrained folk custom with historical roots, when they were looking for a wife for their son not for a wife for a son, but, first of all, for a free worker. Peasants, when marrying off their daughters, were guided more by economic motives than by emotions: only those who were mature enough and possessed physical strength could cope with heavy field work, caring for livestock, and many household trades.

In the Russian countryside in the second half of the 19th century, snogging was quite common and was not considered a crime against peace by customary law, snogging was interpreted by peasants, first of all, as a sin. While according to Russian law, snohachestvo as a form of adultery was a criminal offense, equated to incest and punishable by “exile” to Tomsk or Tobolsk provinces, or consignment to correctional detention wards”. In European Russia, snohachestvo led to serious crimes. The Russian ethnographer-belletrist S. V. Maximov comes to the conclusion that snokhachnost in its essence is not only a criminal act for which one is exiled to Siberia, it is an immoral phenomenon that gives rise to new immoral actions - new adulteries. It is an immoral phenomenon that gives rise to new immoral actions - new adulteries. Snokhachestvo led to serious consequences: quarrels, difficult life of the wife in the family, divorce (which was quite rare in the village), division of movable and immovable property. And moreover, snogging led to serious crimes: rape, incest, abortion and even murder. Historian and ethnographer N. A. Kostrov claimed that in Tomsk province during 25 years (1836-1861) “there were 103 cases of murder of a husband by his wife or wife by her husband before the courts; consequently, for every year there are 4 cases”.

Snokachestvo was considered incestuous by the Russian Orthodox Church and unseemly by the obshchina, the rural community. Legally it was considered a form of rape and was punished with fifteen to twenty lashes. Understandably, cases of snokhachestvo were not publicized and the crime remained latent, making it difficult to assess its true extent in the Russian Empire.

One of the first Russian writers to decry snokhachestvo, describing it as a form of "sexual debasement", was Alexander Radishchev, who saw it as an outgrowth of Russian serfdom. In the 19th century, its resurgence was fueled by obligatory conscription and "the seasonal departure of young men for work outside the village."

Snokhachestvo remained relatively widespread even after the abolition of serfdom in 1861. Vladimir Dmitrievich Nabokov, a jurist, resented the fact that "nowhere it seems, except Russia, has at least one form of incest assumed the character of an almost normal everyday occurrence, designated by the appropriate technical term." The Narodnik writer Gleb Uspensky, while deploring the plight of young peasant women, sympathized with "the emotional and physical needs of the mature peasant man."

The condescending attitude of the villagers to snokhachstvo was due to the legacy of patriarchal life and the authority of the Bolshak in the peasant family. In the provinces, for example, "in the Oryol province the attitude towards daughter-in-law relations was tolerant." In the villages of Konevka and Melovoe, peasants even said that this "has been the practice for a long time, not by them, but by their elders." With the transition to a nuclear family and the growing self-consciousness of peasant women. This form of sexual slavery became obsolete. In the absence of means of protection, the curve birth rate curve in the village fairly objectively reflected the periods when peasants, in accordance with the requirements of the Orthodox Church, abstained from sexual intimacy. Prostitution did not exist in the village, but in every village there were a few women of available behavior. It should not be forgotten that the prostitutes who prostituted in the cities were mostly yesterday's peasant women. Sexual inversions were not widespread in the rural environment due to the prohibition contained in church and civil law, as well as due to the negative attitude of public opinion in the village of the village public opinion.

Snokhachestvo in the arts

There are sexual connotations in the relationship between Katerina and her father-in-law in Shostakovich's 1934 opera Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District, but not in the 1865 story it is based upon.

In 1927, Olga Preobrazhenskaia, "the leading woman director of [Soviet] fiction films in the twenties", and her co-director, Ivan Pravov, released a film condemning snokhachestvo. Titled The Peasant Women of Ryazan (in Russian, Baby ryazanskie), the silent film is about the rape and pregnancy of a woman whose husband is away in World War I. The rapist is her father-in-law, and the woman, overcome by shame, drowns herself when her husband returns from battle.

References

  1. В. Б. Безгин (2012). Правовые обычаи и правосудие русских крестьян второй половины XIX – начала XX века [Legal customs and justice of Russian peasants of the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries] (in Russian). Тамбов: Тамбовский государственный технический университет. p. 11.
  2. "In Russia during the second half of the 19th and early 20th centuries, snokhachestvo was a rather widespread type of sexual crime. With the modernization taking place in Russia during this time, the countryside witnessed: the disintegration of large patriarchal families into small nuclear families, and the gradual transition of the majority of the peasantry from the traditional sphere of customary law to the official normative one. This led to significant emancipation of women within families, a transformation of peasant views, and the near complete disappearance of snokhachestvo as a shameful phenomenon in peasant families.” Fedorov, S. G. (2015). Snokhachestvo and Lynching in the Customary Law of Russian and Siberian Villages in the Second Half of the 19th - Early 20th Centuries. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art History. Questions of Theory and Practice, (11-1), 185-188.
  3. Abraham Władysław (1925). Zawarcie małżeństwa w pierwotnem prawie polskiem [Entering into marriage in the original Polish law] (in Polish). Lwów: Towarzystwo Naukowe.
  4. Krawiec A (2000). Seksualność w średniowiecznej Polsce [Sexuality in medieval Poland] (in Polish). Poznan: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie. pp. 69–70.
  5. Энгельштейн, Лора. Ключи счастья. Секс и поиски путей обновления России на рубеже XIX – XX веков [Keys of Happiness. Sex and the search for ways to renew Russia at the turn of the XIX - XX centuries.] (in Russian). Moscow. p. 52.
  6. Смирнов, A. (1877). Очерки семейных отношений по обычному праву [Essays on family relations under customary law] (in Russian) (3 ed.). Санкт-Петербург: Юридический вестник. pp. 110–112.
  7. Богаевский П. М. (1889). Заметки о юридическом быте крестьян Сарапульского уезда Вятской губернии // Сборник сведений для изучения быта крестьянского населения России [Notes on the legal life of peasants in the Sarapul district of the Vyatka province // Collection of information for studying the life of the peasant population of Russia] (in Russian) (1 ed.). Москва: Н. Харузин. pp. 1–34.
  8. Максимов С. В. (2010). Собрание сочинений: в 7-ми томах [Collected works: in 7 volumes] (in Russian). Санкт-Петербург: Книжный клуб «КниговеК». p. 70.
  9. Харузин, Михаил Николаевич (2004). Сведения о казацких общинах на Дону : материалы для обычного права // Русская семейная и сексуальная культура глазами историков, этнографов, литераторов, фольклористов, правоведов и богословов XIX — начала XX века [Information about Cossack communities on the Don: materials for customary law // Russian family and sexual culture through the eyes of historians, ethnographers, writers, folklorists, jurists and theologians of the 19th - early 20th centuries] (in Russian). Москва: НИЦ «Ладомир». pp. 212–213. ISBN 978-5518028937.
  10. Безгин В. Б. (2009). Половые преступления в сельской повседневности конца XIX – начала XX вв [Sexual crimes in the 19th - 20th centuries.] (in Russian). Право и политика. p. 55. ISBN 978-3844356038.
  11. Пушкарева H. Л. (1997). Частная жизнь русской женщины: невеста, жена, любовница (X — начало XIX в.) [The private life of a Russian woman: bride, wife, mistress (10th – early 19th century)]. Москва: НИЦ «Ладомир». pp. 160–161. ISBN 5-86218-230-6.
  12. Ф. А. Брокгауза и И. А. Ефрона (1895). Кровосмешение // Энциклопедический словарь Ф. А. Брокгауза и И. А. Ефрона: в 86-ти т [Incest // Encyclopedic Dictionary of F. A. Brockhaus and I. A. Efron: in 86 volumes] (in Russian). СПб: Типо-Литография И. А. Ефрона. p. 801.
  13. Федоров С. Г. (2015). Снохачество и самосуд в обычном праве российской и сибирской деревень во второй половине XIX - начале ХХ вв [Cultivation and lynching in the customary law of Russian and Siberian villages in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.] (in Russian). Тамбов: Грамота. pp. 185–188.
  14. Тыдыкова Н. В (2008). Насильственные половые преступления: обоснованность криминализации и квалификация по объективным признакам [Violent sexual offences: the validity of criminalization and qualification by objective features] (in Russian). Тюмень. p. 35.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  15. . Костров Н (1876). Юридические обычаи крестьян-старожилов Томской губернии [Legal customs of peasant old-timers of Tomsk Province] (in Russian). Томск: Томская губернская типография. p. 117.
  16. ^ Engelstein, Laura. The Keys to Happiness: Sex and the Search for Modernity in Fin-de-siècle Russia. Cornell University Press, 1992. ISBN 0-8014-9958-5, p. 45.
  17. Mondry, Henrietta. Pure, Strong And Sexless: The Peasant Woman's Body and Gleb Uspensky. Rodopi, 2005. ISBN 90-420-1828-3, pp. 34–35.
  18. Безгин, Владимир Борисович (2004). Крестьянская повседневность (Традиции конца XIX – начала XX века) [Peasant everyday life (Traditions of the late XIX - early XX century)] (in Russian). Москва - Тамбов: Издательско-полиграфический центр Тамбовского государственного технического университета. p. 183. ISBN 5-8265-0311-4.
  19. Movies for the Masses: Popular Cinema and Soviet Society in the 1920s by Denise Jeanne Youngblood. Cambridge University Press (1992) at p. 168. ISBN 0-521-46632-6 Accessed August 19, 2007.

External links

Incest
Types
Legality
Culture
Theory
Science
Psychology
Cases
Related
Categories: