Misplaced Pages

Talk:Éamon de Valera

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconPolitics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIreland Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconConservatism High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNorthern Ireland Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconInternational relations
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIrish republicanism High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish republicanism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish republicanism and Irish nationalism related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish republicanismWikipedia:WikiProject Irish republicanismTemplate:WikiProject Irish republicanismIrish republicanism
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Éamon de Valera article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
Former featured article candidateÉamon de Valera is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 14, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
August 24, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 15, 2020Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 9, 2004, March 9, 2005, March 9, 2006, March 9, 2012, March 9, 2016, March 9, 2017, March 9, 2019, March 9, 2022, and March 9, 2023.
Current status: Former featured article candidate
This page has been cited as a source by a notable professional or academic publication:
Pace International Law Review
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Troubles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)
  • Neutrality: All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Archiving icon
Archives
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
  1. Before 2006 (except one thread)
  2. 2006
  3. 2007
  4. 2008–09
  5. 2010


This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.


"Contentious changes"

Using the ruse of defending NPOV to restore text that describes a revolutionary group, their internal organization, and their internationally unrecognized "republic" as if it were valid state with legitimate, legal offices is utterly laughable. Historial revisionism at its finest. MIESIANIACAL 22:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Be careful around Irish political pages. It can get mighty rough. GoodDay (talk) 23:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Let's look at some of the language used in your edits:
  • to ask for official recognition of the revolutionary republic, wikilinking to Irish Republic. Fails WP:ASTONISH.
  • While American recognition of the rebel republic had been his priority. Fails WP:NPOV by being distinctly non-neutral. And I believe unsupported by the source.
  • President of the revolutionary republic. Also fails WP:NPOV as de Valera's title during the period of 26 August 1921 and 9 January 1922 was President of the Republic.
  • When fighting broke out in Dublin between the Four Courts garrison and the new Free State Army, republicans backed the IRA men. Removes context that was present in the long standing text.
  • The prime minister of the Free State, W. T. Cosgrave Cosgrave never held the position of Taoiseach/prime minister, as the position didn't exist until 1937. During 1923 Cosgrave was President of the Executive Council.
You are welcome to take this to the WP:NPOVN, if you are unhappy with my responses. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi both. With apologies, I hadn't noted this discussion before making some related edits myself. In short however, I agree with Sideswipe9th on several points here. And have restored the description of Cosgrave's role (because, as noted by Sideswipe9th and my own edsumm, "prime minister" isn't entirely accurate. And certainly isn't more accurate or an improvement over the existing wording). And have also restored what would seem to be the most important part of the sentence about the start of the civil war. I have also restored the quoted text. Which was changed in a way that is problematic under MOS:PMC guidelines. (In short, if the source uses caps, then the quoted text should use caps. We don't "correct" sources to suit our own or the project's stylistic preferences...) Guliolopez (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
It's all good. For some reason Twinkle only rolled back three of the edits and not all four, and I'd missed that until now. The changes you've made Guliolopez look good to me. Sideswipe9th (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism?

He was re-elected President in 1966, aged 84, until 2013...

Is this vandalism?

Valetude (talk) 19:24, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Not sure why you cut off the rest of the sentence. But, in full, it reads " until 2013 a world record for the oldest elected head of state". The authors intent was clearly to communicate, not that "until 2013 ", But that "until 2013, this was a record for oldest head of state". Perhaps the writer could have been clearer in wording and sentence construction. But there is no indication that the writer intended this as vandalism. Guliolopez (talk) 14:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

The Date of de Valera's Birth Certificate Amendment

de Valera's birth certificate on file with New York City's Department of Records shows that it was amended on June 30, 1916 (https://a860-historicalvitalrecords.nyc.gov/view/68888). However, a deleted (but archived) blog post on nyc.gov cited the year as "1910" not 1916 because they relied on a low resolution copy of the original (see here: https://web.archive.org/web/20040208005923/http://www.nyc.gov/html/records/html/features/devalera.shtml). The low resolution copy made it appear as though the 1916 says 1910 and it is what Misplaced Pages currently relies on for de Valera's birth certificate amendment date. The date of the amendment should rely on the primary source, which is the high resolution image of the birth certificate viewable on file at nyc.gov that says 1916, not a deleted blog post that used a less legible low resolution copy. The date should be corrected to 1916. Thank you! Seanmca2 (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Given that the previous (secondary) source is no longer live and as the original (primary) source does appear to be dated to 1916, for now I've taken out the year. Pending more discussion, consensus and clarity. Guliolopez (talk) 17:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
The original wiki article date of 1910 was simply wrong. The 1910 date appears to come from a single typographical error repeated elsewhere with no basis in any primary source or contemporary secondary source. Basic historical practice requires that we adopt the primary source material in this situation.
https://www.archontology.org/nations/eire/eire_rep2/valera4.php
I’m unable to find any serious academic writing that would support 1910. This is a done deal. 152.208.101.233 (talk) 18:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: