| Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided March 18, 2008 | |
| Full case name | Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party |
| Citations | 552 U.S. 442 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Washington's top-two primary system does not infringe upon smaller political parties' associational rights. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito |
| Concurrence | Roberts, joined by Alito |
| Dissent | Scalia, joined by Kennedy |
Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party, 552 U.S. 442 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Washington's top-two primary system does not infringe upon smaller political parties' associational rights.
See also
References
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party, 552 U.S. 442 (2008).
- El-Haj, Tabatha Abu (2018). "Networking the Party: First Amendment Rights and the Pursuit of Responsive Party Government". Columbia Law Review. 118 (4): 1225–1302. ISSN 0010-1958. JSTOR 26419426.
External links
- Text of Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party, 552 U.S. 442 (2008) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |